1964 D Quarter Mint Mark Value & Price Guide

Identifying the mint location on a 1964 quarter: A crucial element for collectors and enthusiasts.

A mint mark on a 1964 quarter designates the specific United States Mint facility where the coin was produced. Different mints produced quarters throughout the year, and each mint used a unique letter or symbol as its mark. For example, a "D" mint mark indicates the San Francisco Mint. These marks, subtle details, can significantly impact a coin's value and historical context. Knowing the mint mark helps distinguish and identify coins from various production sites.

Understanding the mint mark's importance provides collectors with valuable information about the coin's origin and production run. The variation in mint marks offers insights into the volume of coins produced at each location and can reveal subtle differences in the quality and finish of the coins. Historical records, tied to the mint marks, can also provide more context to the coin's production within the era. This additional data aids numismatists in determining a coin's rarity and potential value.

Transitioning to examining specific 1964 quarters, the presence and type of mint mark become a focal point for assessment.

1964 Quarter D Mint Mark

Identifying the San Francisco Mint's (D mint mark) production of 1964 quarters offers valuable insights for collectors and numismatists. Understanding these details is essential for accurate evaluation and appreciation.

• Coin identification
• Historical context
• Production location
• Rarity variation
• Collectible value
• Numismatic study
• Grading criteria

The "D" mint mark on a 1964 quarter signifies its origin at the San Francisco Mint. Historical records tied to the mint mark provide context to production volumes. Rarity and collectible value differ among various 1964 quarters depending on the mint mark, influencing prices. For example, a well-preserved 1964 D quarter with excellent condition may command a higher price than its counterpart from another mint. This detail, combined with other grading criteria, provides numismatists with valuable tools for study and analysis, showcasing the significance of a 1964 quarter D mint mark in the world of numismatics.

1. Coin identification

Accurate coin identification hinges on discerning crucial details, including the mint mark. For the 1964 quarter, the "D" mint mark, signifying production at the San Francisco Mint, is a critical component of identification. This mark allows differentiation between quarters produced at different mints, crucial for collectors and researchers. A 1964 quarter lacking the "D" mark cannot be definitively identified as a San Francisco-produced coin. The presence or absence of this specific detail directly impacts the coin's overall identification, impacting its value and historical context.

The practical significance extends beyond simple identification. Knowing the mint mark informs collectors about the coin's origin and potential production run characteristics. Differences in quality, condition, or even the presence of minor variations can be linked to the specific mint's procedures at the time. This understanding is valuable when assessing the potential worth of a particular coin. Collectors meticulously examine these factors to refine their collections. Precise identification, relying on the mint mark as a key element, is essential for accurate grading and valuation. Misidentification, particularly concerning mint marks, can lead to inaccurate appraisals, affecting collectors' investment decisions. The mint mark is indispensable to a thorough coin identification process.

In summary, the "D" mint mark is integral to identifying a 1964 quarter. Accurate identification hinges on its presence or absence. This detail allows collectors and researchers to establish a coin's origin and potential characteristics, affecting its value and historical significance. Precise identification procedures using the mint mark are vital for avoiding misinterpretations and maintaining the integrity of coin valuations and collections. The role of the mint mark in identification is paramount for understanding the broader context of numismatic studies.

2. Historical Context

The 1964 quarter's "D" mint mark, signifying San Francisco Mint production, provides a window into the historical context of coin production during that era. Understanding this connection reveals nuances in minting practices, production volumes, and the overall economic and societal backdrop of the time. Analyzing the historical data associated with this mint mark illuminates the specifics of coin production in the United States during this period.

• Production Volume and Distribution
  

  The "D" mint mark's presence on a 1964 quarter indicates the coin's origin at the San Francisco Mint. Historical records related to this mint mark can shed light on the overall production volume at that facility during 1964. Comparing these volumes to other mints' output provides insight into distribution patterns and the overall supply of quarters in circulation. Analyzing these factors reveals how the production at San Francisco might have influenced the availability of the coin across the nation.

• Minting Practices and Quality Control
  

  Historical documentation associated with the San Francisco Mint's "D" mint mark in 1964 might reveal details about specific minting practices and quality control procedures employed during that period. Comparing these practices with those of other mints offers insights into regional variations in minting techniques and standards. Such analysis can inform understanding of the coin's potential variations in design, strike, and finish. Examining these practices provides contextual clues to the consistency, or lack thereof, in the quality of coins produced at the San Francisco Mint.

• Economic and Social Conditions
  

  The economic and social conditions prevailing in the United States during 1964 can be indirectly reflected in the minting process. The demand for currency, supply constraints, and governmental policies likely influenced production decisions, reflected in the number of coins produced at various locations. The "D" mint mark, therefore, contributes to a richer historical understanding of these broader societal trends by providing a specific data point related to the supply of circulating currency during the year.

• Numismatic Trends and Collector Interest
  

  Historical records regarding the San Francisco Mint's production, linked to the "D" mint mark, may illuminate contemporaneous numismatic trends and collector interest. Understanding these trends helps contextualize the current value and desirability of 1964 "D" quarters. Information on early collector preferences and market dynamics can further enhance understanding of the historical impact of this specific mint mark on the field of numismatics.

In conclusion, the historical context embedded in the "D" mint mark on a 1964 quarter extends beyond a simple identification. It reveals a rich tapestry of information related to production volumes, quality control, economic conditions, and numismatic trends. By analyzing these intertwined elements, a more comprehensive understanding of the coin and its place in history emerges.

3. Production location

The "D" mint mark on a 1964 quarter unequivocally signifies its production at the San Francisco Mint. This direct correlation between the mint mark and the location of production is fundamental to understanding the coin's provenance and historical context. The location of minting profoundly impacts various aspects of the coin, from its inherent characteristics to its eventual value within the numismatic community.

Variations in minting practices among different facilities influence the coin's characteristics. For instance, minor differences in the quality of the metal used or in the specific processes employed at each mint can result in subtle variations in the appearance, weight, or even the overall feel of the coin. These nuances are particularly important to discerning collectors and graders, as they provide insight into the specific manufacturing conditions under which the coin was produced. Examining the production location's influence aids in precisely evaluating the coin's condition and associated worth. Consequently, accurate determination of the production location, as evidenced by the mint mark, is vital for accurate coin valuation.

Understanding the production location, in this case, San Francisco, informs the broader historical context of the coin. Records relating to the San Francisco Mint's operations during 1964 provide insight into the era's minting processes, production volume, and associated economic factors. Comparing this data with details from other mints allows for a richer understanding of the nation's overall monetary production and distribution during that specific year. The link between the mint mark and production location thus transcends simple identification; it opens a pathway to a deeper appreciation for the coin's history and significance within a broader historical framework. Precise identification of the production location, as indicated by the "D" mint mark, is essential for accurate valuation and historical study.

4. Rarity variation

The 1964 quarter D mint mark, signifying production at the San Francisco Mint, interacts significantly with rarity variations. The interplay between production location and overall coin availability influences a coin's perceived rarity. Factors like specific production runs, condition variations, and the overall volume produced at each mint all contribute to the relative rarity of a particular 1964 quarter D.

• Production Volume and Distribution
  

  Differences in production volume at the San Francisco Mint, compared to other mints, directly affect the perceived rarity. A lower production volume at a particular mint for a given year results in fewer coins being available, potentially increasing the perceived rarity of those coins. Conversely, higher production volumes reduce a coin's rarity. This is a crucial aspect for collectors, as rarer coins generally command higher prices.

• Condition Variation and Preservation
  

  The condition of a 1964 quarter D, regardless of production volume, significantly influences its rarity. Well-preserved, uncirculated coins are often rarer and more desirable than circulated ones. The relative scarcity of exceptionally preserved coins from specific mints impacts their value within the collection market.

• Errors and Varieties
  

  Mint errors or varieties, even in smaller numbers, can increase rarity. A 1964 quarter D with a rare error, such as a misaligned design element or a die crack, is potentially more valuable and rare than a typical example. These errors and varieties are meticulously sought by collectors interested in the intricacies of coin production.

• Specific Year and Mint Combinations
  

  The combination of a particular year (1964) and a specific mint location (San Francisco, represented by the "D" mint mark) plays a role in determining a coin's rarity. The specific volume of coins produced at that location in 1964, compared to other years or mints, can impact the rarity and thus value of the coin for collectors.

Ultimately, the rarity of a 1964 quarter D is not solely determined by the mint mark, but by a complex interplay of production volumes, condition, potential errors, and the particular year and mint location combination. These facets contribute to the coin's overall desirability and market value among collectors and enthusiasts.

5. Collectible value

The "1964 quarter D mint mark" significantly influences a coin's collectible value. Rarity, a crucial determinant of value, is directly tied to the mint mark. The "D" signifies production at the San Francisco Mint. Variations in production volumes at different mints during 1964 affect a coin's scarcity. A lower production volume at the San Francisco Mint contributes to higher perceived rarity and, consequently, a potentially higher collectible value for a 1964 quarter D. Conversely, a higher production volume diminishes perceived rarity and potentially lowers collectible value. A 1964 quarter D with superior condition, beyond mere circulation, may command a premium, regardless of general rarity levels associated with the mint mark.

Beyond simple rarity, condition plays a substantial role. A 1964 quarter D in "uncirculated" or "extremely fine" condition, irrespective of its mintage, often commands a premium due to its preservation. Conversely, a circulated coin might have reduced value, irrespective of its mint mark. Collectors, especially those focused on particular years and specific mints, often prioritize condition alongside rarity. The combination of condition and the "D" mint mark significantly impacts the coin's market appeal and ultimately its value. The interaction of these factors, along with fluctuating market forces and collector demand, all shape the final determination of collectible value.

Understanding the connection between collectible value and the 1964 quarter D mint mark is essential for collectors and investors. Accurate evaluation requires careful consideration of both the mint mark's role in establishing rarity and the condition of the specific coin. Knowledge of production figures, condition grading scales, and market trends empowers informed decisions. This knowledge helps avoid overpaying or undervaluing a 1964 quarter D, crucial for responsible collecting and investment. Furthermore, the principles discussed here extend to other coins, underscoring the crucial role of mint marks and condition in determining collectible value across numismatic pursuits.

6. Numismatic study

Numismatic study, encompassing the systematic examination of coins, provides crucial context for understanding the significance of the 1964 quarter D mint mark. The "D" mark, signifying San Francisco Mint production, becomes a critical piece of data within this larger framework. Analysis of this mint mark, integrated with broader numismatic principles, unveils intricate relationships between production, distribution, and the coin's eventual value.

A key component of numismatic study concerning the 1964 quarter D involves meticulous examination of production volumes from the San Francisco Mint. Historical records, when combined with the "D" mint mark, reveal how production at this facility compared to others. This data aids in assessing the coin's relative rarity. Furthermore, numismatic study explores the condition variations among 1964 quarter Ds. Differences in mint quality control practices, reflected in the coins, are analyzed. The practical application of this knowledge helps collectors make informed decisions about acquisition, appraisal, and investment strategies. For instance, a 1964 quarter D in pristine condition, contrasted with a circulated one, exhibits variations in value, even with the same mint mark. Numismatic study disentangles these intricate connections.

In conclusion, numismatic study provides a structured approach to understanding the 1964 quarter D mint mark's significance. By analyzing production volumes, condition variations, and historical trends related to the San Francisco Mint, the field unravels the complexities that ultimately shape a coin's value. This comprehensive understanding benefits collectors, researchers, and investors, guiding them through the nuances of evaluating and appreciating this coin. The "D" mint mark serves as a focal point, connecting the coin to wider numismatic practices, thereby enriching the overall study and appreciation of the coin's place in history.

7. Grading criteria

Grading criteria for coins, a standardized system for assessing a coin's condition, directly interacts with the 1964 quarter D mint mark. The quality of a 1964 quarter D, irrespective of its production volume or location, significantly impacts its value. A well-preserved coin commands a higher price than a coin with significant wear. Grading criteria, therefore, are essential for accurately determining a 1964 quarter D's value, incorporating factors beyond the mint mark itself.

• Condition and Wear
  

  Grading criteria meticulously examine the degree of wear and tear on the coin. Factors like scratches, nicks, and dents are assessed, impacting the coin's grade. A 1964 quarter D exhibiting minimal wear will receive a higher grade than one with extensive wear. This is critical, as condition directly correlates with the coin's collectible value, regardless of the mint mark. The level of preservation directly affects the grading and, consequently, the price.

• Details and Design Elements
  

  Grading considers the sharpness and clarity of design elements. The mint mark "D" itself, along with other features, is evaluated for sharpness and definition. A coin with crisp, well-defined details receives a higher grade than one with blurred or indistinct features. Such scrutiny is integral because a coin's appearance directly reflects the quality control and precision of the minting process. The mint mark's visibility and integrity are assessed as part of this evaluation.

• Centricity and Strike Quality
  

  The alignment of the design elements on the coin's planchet, known as centricity, is assessed. Also, the impression of the design on the metal, known as strike quality, is evaluated. A well-centered and sharply struck coin receives a higher grade. Variations in centricity and strike quality affect the coin's overall visual appeal and are crucial aspects of grading, often impacting the perceived quality of a 1964 quarter D. The "D" mint mark's appearance on a misaligned coin is affected by this, too.

• Surface Condition and Tone
  

  The smoothness and evenness of the coin's surface, along with its tone, are key factors in grading. A coin with a smooth, unblemished surface and a consistent tone earns a higher grade than one with significant blemishes or inconsistencies. A 1964 quarter D with a dull or tarnished surface will receive a lower grade. The condition of the surface directly correlates with the perceived quality of the coin's preservation, influencing grading and, consequently, value.

In summary, grading criteria are integral to assessing the value of a 1964 quarter D. The detailed evaluation process, encompassing condition, design clarity, and strike quality, combined with the mint mark, provides a comprehensive understanding of the coin's condition and relative worth. Collectors and investors benefit from the standardized approach, ensuring accurate valuation and enhancing the appreciation of this historical coin.

Frequently Asked Questions about the 1964 Quarter D Mint Mark

This section addresses common inquiries regarding the 1964 quarter with a "D" mint mark, providing accurate and concise information.

Question 1: What does the "D" mint mark on a 1964 quarter signify?

The "D" mint mark on a 1964 quarter indicates the coin was produced at the San Francisco Mint.

Question 2: How does the mint mark impact a 1964 quarter's value?

The mint mark, in conjunction with the coin's condition and overall rarity, plays a role in determining value. Production volume at the San Francisco Mint in 1964 affects the perceived rarity of a "D" quarter. A lower production volume generally leads to a higher value.

Question 3: Are there different types of 1964 quarter D mint marks?

No, the "D" mint mark on a 1964 quarter universally denotes San Francisco Mint production.

Question 4: How can I tell if a 1964 quarter has a genuine "D" mint mark?

The "D" mint mark should be readily visible on the coin's reverse. Expert opinion or reputable numismatic resources can assist in confirming the mark's authenticity if uncertainty exists.

Question 5: Why is the mint mark important for numismatists and collectors?

The mint mark provides crucial provenance information, aiding in understanding a coin's production location and overall rarity. This information allows for informed evaluation and historical context.

In summary, the 1964 quarter D mint mark signifies origin at the San Francisco Mint, affecting value based on production volume and condition. Careful observation and understanding of grading criteria are important for accurate assessment.

Moving forward, collectors can delve deeper into specific examples of 1964 quarters, examining the interplay of mint marks and condition.

Conclusion

The 1964 quarter D mint mark, signifying production at the San Francisco Mint, holds significant importance within the realm of numismatics. This mark provides crucial provenance information, enabling identification and evaluation. Factors such as production volume, condition, and potential errors or varieties intricately influence the collectible value of a 1964 quarter D. Understanding the interplay between the mint mark, historical production data, and grading criteria is paramount for accurate assessment. The mark's presence or absence serves as a pivotal point in establishing a coin's origin and its place within the broader historical context of U.S. coin production in 1964.

Further research into historical records associated with the San Francisco Mint's 1964 production, coupled with detailed analysis of individual specimens, can enhance understanding of the factors influencing the coin's value and rarity. The importance of the 1964 quarter D mint mark lies not only in its identification function but also in its potential to illuminate the intricacies of coin production and the broader historical context of the period. Careful study and understanding of this mint mark continue to be vital for collectors, researchers, and investors seeking to appreciate the rich history and value of this coin.